Also See:
NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA | NASA

Space Shuttle Enterprise
Space Shuttle Enterprise The Shuttle Orbiter Enterprise (NASA Designation: OV-101) was the first Space Shuttle built for NASA. It was initially constructed without engines or a functional heat shield and was therefore not capable of space operations without a refit. It was intended to be the second space shuttle to fly after the Space Shuttle Columbia even though it was built first, however, it was found to be cheaper to refit a test article (STA-099) into the Space Shuttle Challenger. Originally planned to be called Constitution, the test vehicle was renamed following a write-in campaign after the starship featured on the television show Star Trek, which in turn was named for the various ships named USS Enterprise. Amusingly, in one of the subsequent Star Trek movies

The last remaining debate was over the nature of the boosters. NASA had been looking at no less than four solutions to this problem, one a development of the existing Saturn lower stage, another using "dumb" pressure-fed liquid fuel engines of a new design, and finally either a large single solid rocket, or two (or more) smaller ones. The decision was eventually made on the smaller solids due to their lower development costs (a decision that had been echoed throughout the whole Shuttle program). While the liquid fueled systems provided better performace and enhanced safety, delivery capability to orbit is much more a function of the upper-stage performance and weight than the lower. The money was simply better spent elsewhere. NASA's Space Shuttle program is an ongoing endeavor, started in the late 1960s, that has created the world's first partially reusable space launch system, and the first spacecraft capable of carrying large satellites both to and from low Earth orbit. Each shuttle is designed for a projected lifespan of 100 launches. The original purpose of the program was to ferry supplies to a space station. In reality, the Shuttle is the United States' sole manned launch vehicle and has totally dominated NASA's operations since the mid 1970s. With the construction of the International Space Station the Shuttle has finally begun to be used for its original purpose. In January 2004, it was announced that the Shuttle fleet would be replaced by 2010.

Table of contents
1 Components
Statistics
3

Space Shuttle Challenger
Space Shuttle Challenger Shuttle Orbiter Challenger (NASA Designation: OV-99) was a Space Shuttle orbiter. Challenger was the second shuttle orbiter to be placed into service (after Columbia) and was constructed using a body frame (STA-099) that had initially been produced for use as a test article. Its maiden voyage was on April 4, 1983, and made eight subsequent round trips to low earth orbit before it was destroyed during launch for its tenth mission, mission 51-L. Table of contents showTocToggle("show","hide") 1 Flights 2 Flight Log 3 Related articles 4

Shuttles

A number of designs were proposed, but many of them were complex and varied widely in their systems. An attempt to re-simplify was made in the form of the "DC-3" by one of the few people left in NASA with the political clout to pull it off, Maxime Faget, who had designed the Mercury capsule, among others. The DC-3 was a small craft with a 20,000lbs (or less) payload, a four-man crew, and limited manuverability. At a minimum, the DC-3 provided a baseline "workable" (but not terribly advanced) system by which other systems could be compared for price/performance tradeoffs.